User:Toon Ganondorf/Ragnabattle (March Madness)/Bash Region

Onslaught/Armour Geddon vs Cerberus v Griffon
{| class="wikitable" !Onslaught v Armour Geddon !Cerberus v Griffon
 * Onslaught_vs_armour_geddon.JPG
 * Griffon pitted quickly.jpg
 * Votes for Onslaught/Armour Geddon
 * 1) Yeah, there's still the issue that this was an actual fight. Cerberus may have been a "record breaker", but it still essentially pitted a "dead" robot, which simply is not interesting. No one praises Agent Orange vs Max Damage, Evil Weevil vs Panzer or Dreadnaut vs Rattus Rattus. Why does Cerberus vs Griffon get all the praise? Especially when Fire Storm vs Crasha Gnasha, equally as quick, was so much more flashy? At least Crasha Gnasha tried to fight, as did Armour Geddon, whilst Griffon just shuffled forward, cut out, and that was that. CrashBash (talk) 12:58, June 25, 2017 (UTC)
 * "Being second is to be the first of the ones who lose" - Aryton Senna. Think this is a good quote, especially after a dramatic Formula One race today. But anyhow, the reason why nobody praises the other battles is because they were not the world record holders. If they were, they would receive the praise, not Cerberus vs Griffon. And besides, I love an interesting world record like this, which is why had Gravity vs Dantomkia been in this series, I would have voted for that too! As for Fire Storm vs Crasha Gnasha, I like that battle as it was explosive. But again, it is not the world record, so I understand why it is less praised (although in fairness, people will remember it for Firestorm's debut).  SpaceManiac888   (Talk)  15:41, June 25, 2017 (UTC)
 * But considering that in all three of the examples I provided, the losing robots never actually moved, they should be the record holders, since victory was achieved in zero seconds. And, again, Cerberus pitted a "dead" robot. That's hardly spectacular. If Griffon had actually been fighting back, then I'd understand the praise. But no, it didn't. It just stopped after moving a few centimetres and pretty much allowed Cerberus to pit it. Not to mention, when it did stop, Cerberus was nowhere near it. At least Crasha Gnasha made contact with Fire Storm before it stopped (I.E. exploded). CrashBash (talk) 16:12, June 25, 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) Cerberus vs Griffon was always weird for me. As quick as it was, it was sheer luck that allowed Cerberus to win really. I love Armour Geddon and Onslaught and this was a lot of fun to watch. CaliforniaKingsnake (talk) 13:22, June 25, 2017 (UTC)
 * 2) Yeah, I'll back this too. Armour Geddon was hopelessly entertaining and the way it was eventually, slowly rolled home was brilliant. Good, solid first round fun. Nweston8 (talk) 16:18, June 25, 2017 (UTC)
 * Votes for Cerberus v Griffon
 * 1) Okay, so Purple Predator/Toe-Cutter somehow slipped into the lineup twice, so I've picked one of the three fights eliminated in the bonus qualifier (Onslaught's win, Evil Weevil's loss to Tiberius and Mousetrap, and Twn Trwn's elimination to Trident) to be reinstated as they should've made round 1 without fighting a qualified. Onto this fight, Cerberus' pitting of Griffon is better than Onslaught's defeat of the unwieldy axlebot.     (t    c)  10:40, June 25, 2017 (UTC)
 * 2) World records are almost always interesting. SpaceManiac888   (Talk)  11:39, June 25, 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) Okay, so Purple Predator/Toe-Cutter somehow slipped into the lineup twice, so I've picked one of the three fights eliminated in the bonus qualifier (Onslaught's win, Evil Weevil's loss to Tiberius and Mousetrap, and Twn Trwn's elimination to Trident) to be reinstated as they should've made round 1 without fighting a qualified. Onto this fight, Cerberus' pitting of Griffon is better than Onslaught's defeat of the unwieldy axlebot.     (t    c)  10:40, June 25, 2017 (UTC)
 * 2) World records are almost always interesting. SpaceManiac888   (Talk)  11:39, June 25, 2017 (UTC)