User blog comment:Toon Ganondorf/Series 9 Sweepstake with all robots allocated/@comment-9751413-20170309123536/@comment-9751413-20170309221629

There's two ways of going about this. There's the "Don't mention the other sweepstake, or explain that you want to show that your idea is better through example" method, or the Passive Aggressive option you went for.

"This is to prove a point only" - Well why should we sign up then?

"you should blame the "but it worked fine last year" crowd who are likely still complaining about how the printed encyclopaedia is going out of fashion." - You're making no friends with comments like that.

Also, threatening to block someone because you don't like that they have a different opinion to you is the same thing that Trump is doing with his "Fake News" bullcrap and the travel bans.

With quite a few discussion we have on the wiki, including the arena - there are two ways that they happen: Structured argument, or the TG insult way, usually followed by a long back-and-forth with CrashBash.

Can you two stop being at each other's throat all the times, and can we leave warning and/or banning Crash to Toast's discretion only, as I don't trust TG's judgement on Crash's action.

I'm not calling into question your judgement for any other users, I just feel that there is a grudge between the two of you which needs to be sorted out, not through the threat of banning from one user to the other who cannot reply equally or fairly.