Talk:Judges

Just a thought, but should we add each series' Judges to the info boxes on the right series pages, eg. it goes Presented by:, Commentary by: and then Judges:? Llamaman201 (talk) 17:17, 25 June 2009 (UTC)


 * That's not a bad idea. You're quite welcome to go ahead and add them if you so wish. Christophee (talk) 11:00, 26 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Okay, I'll do series 1, 2 and 3, I'm not sure about the others. Llamaman201 (talk) 14:08, 26 June 2009 (UTC)


 * It's all in the judges section on the main Robot Wars page if you need to know who was in each series. Christophee (talk) 13:22, 26 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Ah thanks, but also how do i put it in because I typed the names in, previewed and nothing happened, do I need to do something different than just a regular edit? Llamaman201 (talk) 14:26, 26 June 2009 (UTC)


 * I'll edit the template for you so that it actually shows up on the infobox. Christophee (talk) 15:04, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Defining "Controversial"
OK, before we go ANY further with this, I think we need to come to some sort of agreement here. How, exactly, are we defining "controversial"? CBFan (talk) 09:51, February 16, 2010 (UTC)


 * For one, I've actually not heard anyone besides you say anything about Bolt from the Blue deserving to win over Firestorm 2. How about we define the term 'controversial' as having more than one person talk about it. Typhoon 2 v Storm 2, Razer v Tornado and Judge Shred v Mute have all got many people on both sides, so they are controversial.  Toon Ganondorf    (t    c)  10:56, February 16, 2010 (UTC)


 * Well then, you need to look deeper. I've seen it mentioned many times that Bolt From The Blue deserved the win. Why don't you watch the fight itself? Tell me that wasn't controversial. Besides, you're being inconsistant. CBFan (talk) 11:12, February 16, 2010 (UTC)


 * I have watched the fight. Bolt from the Blue lifted Firestorm, who was the more aggressive and controlled, obviously deserved the win. Because you have now reverted my edit three times with no reason other than to keep my argument invalid, I am going to fully protect the page until this conversation has been settled. We probably need a three-revert rule on here, like Wikipedia does.  Toon Ganondorf    (t    c)  11:17, February 16, 2010 (UTC)


 * Oh, not this AGAIN, Toon Ganondorf. I thought you were better than this. I thought you'd overcome your silly habit of locking the page just to get "your way". Need I remind you, I wasn't the person to write that battle was controversial....Helloher was. Therefore, I'm not the only one. Firestorm also drove up BFTB's wedge a lot, that's not good control. It's close, and thus controversial.


 * Seriously, please stop assuming that it's just between you and me. Talk to Helloher about it. This is not YOUR Wikia, this is OUR Wikia. You did this with Scorpion, you did it AGAIN with Plunderbird, and you're doing it again now....this is a team effort. CBFan (talk) 11:20, February 16, 2010 (UTC)