User blog comment:CrashBash/Top 105 Heat Finals/@comment-4700688-20190603104644/@comment-4700688-20190603125351

It definitely helps to have that insight, so thank you for that, although I'd mark the fight like this:

(Presuming scores are out of 5)


 * Damage caused = 2 points, no argument.
 * Aggression shown = 3 points, no argument
 * Pace of Battle = 3 points, no argument.
 * Performance of Robots = 3 points. Your comment implies that only Judge Shred 3 performed well, but clearly Mute performed well enough to win. Earning style points still counts as performing.
 * Closeness of Fight = 4 points. Not sure how you can award a 2 out of 5 for one of the most debated and close Heat Finals ever, objectively a close bout. Only loses one point because a partial breakdown made it close.
 * Enjoyment = 5 points. I'm not going to dock any points from my third-favourite fight of all time, I understand why you or other people would, but 3 feels too low to me.
 * Malfunction = -1 point. If this category has to be factored in, it shouldn't have a big effect, as Judge Shred's malfunction was hard to notice for a casual viewer, was not a full immobilisation, and did not directly decide the winner of the battle (even though it contributed).
 * Dubious Outcome = -0 points. This category hardly applies to any fights on the list, and it doesn't seem right to me that you have a custom modifier to take points away from specific fights, without mentioning a personal modifier that you can also use to boost your favourites. I see the close outcome as part of the enjoyment, which had a satisfying conclusion when the crowd favourite Mute took it.

On my own score, I would of course implement some kind of modifier to further boost the fight for just generally being great, but that's just me.