Categories on colour of robotsEdit

I just wanted to establish consensus on whether or not we should have categories based on the colours of each robot. I know Jimlaad, based on his comment on his talk page comment, is against this for an understandable reason. However, is anyone in support of creating these categories? SpaceManiac888 (Talk) 19:49, June 14, 2018 (UTC)

No offence, but I personally think not. Most robots are black or grey/silver, and a number of robots are a mix of colours. Not to mention robots like R.O.C.S., which changed across their appearances. Drop Zone mk2 (talk) 20:37, June 14, 2018 (UTC)
Nah, you do not need to say 'no offence' here, call a spade a spade if you must. Nonetheless, you do bring up some valid points here. SpaceManiac888 (Talk) 20:46, June 14, 2018 (UTC)
these seem like categories for the sake of categories, rather than an interesting statistic that people would want to know. That's my issue with it. Jimlaad43(talk) 21:55, June 14, 2018 (UTC)
I'm firmly against having colour categories. Some robots are far too loose in their colour-scheme, or have too many colours, to be easily defined. . TOAST 23:02, June 14, 2018 (UTC)
Personally I see no use for this category since A: it seems less professional and more something for much younger kids and B: we already mention the bot's colour in the Design section so it's pointless.CaliforniaKingsnake (talk) 23:31, June 14, 2018 (UTC)
These types of categories are frowned upon on the BattleBots Wiki, I don't see why we need them here. Especially for robots that changed in appearance significantly over time it would be category clutter. S256 00:30, June 15, 2018 (UTC)
Nope, these categories are just a bit tad pointless.Diotoir the son of nemesis (talk) 05:54, June 15, 2018 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.