Is the categorisation of this page correct? And are we making a category for Australian robots, even though there were only two? Toon Ganondorf (t c) 12:25, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

It's not quite correct, but I'll sort it out. So far we've been making categories for nationalities that have two or more robots (even when they're from the same team like New Zealand), so Australian Robots should have a category. Christophee (talk) 12:31, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Name Edit

I've noticed that on the factsheet it is spelt as Bondi Titch without the hyphen. Is this worth changing or should we just leave it? Christophee (talk) 16:03, November 13, 2009 (UTC)

Not worth it, really. Toon Ganondorf (t c) 21:56, November 13, 2009 (UTC)
Since it doesn't have a hyphen on the robot, it should be changed. I am good at trawling through the wiki to change it if we decide to. Jimlaad43(talk) 16:55, November 18, 2013 (UTC)
Four years after I first asked the question, a positive response. Go ahead and change it. Christophee (talk) 17:50, November 18, 2013 (UTC)
That should be everything in the mainspace fixed. Jimlaad43(talk) 18:07, November 18, 2013 (UTC)

Loanerbot or Stock Robot? Edit

Since it's been established that Bondi-Titch was actually built by the Robot Wars crew, shouldn't it be labelled as one of these? Not sure which one it would count as, but since it seems the team didn't have their own robot, it borders more on Stock Robot. CrashBash (talk) 20:22, August 17, 2013 (UTC)

I'd say stock bot, since they built it specifically to represent Australia and be driven by the JJ's Snackfood winner. RA2; aka Resetti's Replicas. (My Talk) 21:46, August 17, 2013 (UTC)
I agree. It's not a loanerbot because it wasn't replacing a robot built by the team. It was built to be entered by that team in that competition, so it's much more like the stock robots from Series 1. Should it also be removed from the Australian Robots category? Christophee (talk) 01:03, August 18, 2013 (UTC)
I'm going to say keep it because it was specifically built to represent Australia, and looks the part. RA2; aka Resetti's Replicas. (My Talk) 01:19, August 18, 2013 (UTC)
It would create an inconsistency across category names, but seeing as there's only two robots that need to go in the category, we could just call it "Australian Representatives". And yes, I agree with it being a stock robot. ToastUltimatum 01:38, August 18, 2013 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.