Robot RedemptionEdit

Should we consider adding a table for every robot which has won a Robot Redemption battle so far? I feel that Robot Redemption is essentially identical to the Dutch Series 1 Losers' Melees in principle, and should be acknowledged as such, but would like to hear other users' views on this before I go ahead and make the table. VulcansHowl 16:13, November 19, 2017 (UTC)

I don't see why we can't. It's pretty much a smaller version of the LMs, as you say. CrashBash (talk) 16:31, November 19, 2017 (UTC)
It belongs on this page because it gets a sub-section here; however, I fully disagree with Robot Redemption winners being placed in the Reinstated Robots category as it's simply not the same thing. I'd ask Raz3r to hold off on this current venture. TOAST 22:01, August 26, 2018 (UTC)
Isn't Robot Redemption in a way similar to Losers Melees? After all, both involve robots who have previously lost a battle the chance to progress to the next round by battling another losing machine. Seeing as robots who have won Losers Melees have been added to this category, I support Robot Redemption robots being added to it too. Either that, or remove all robots that won a Losers Melee. SpaceManiac888 (Talk) 22:04, August 26, 2018 (UTC)
I'll hold off for now but there's only about two or three left to add on anyway. I'm in agreement with Space. Raz3r(talk) 22:07, August 26, 2018 (UTC)
The problem here that I wasn't aware of before is the inclusion of losers' melee winners. The way that Chompalot, Lizzard and The Morgue were reinstated is completely different to the losers' melee/redemption winners like S3, Dantomkia and Coyote - the first three were 'out' of the tournament, while the other three simply moved into a different round, and were still 'in' the competition. Losers' Melee and Redemption Round winners can have their own category if somebody wants to make one, but the robots who were fully eliminated before being reinstated deserve their own category with no extra noise. TOAST 22:09, August 26, 2018 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.