Possible MergeEdit

Does anyone else see Reptirron as having its own article for no reason? It could easily merge in with Reptirron The Second, I think. Whether it remained as Reptirron The Second or the page was renamed Reptirron would require discussion, but I'm in favour of merging - particularly since the Series 4 and 6 models were relatively similar. Toon Ganondorf (t c) 23:37, December 29, 2009 (UTC)

Maerge them, and keep the name as Reptirron I think. Helloher (Death is not my phone number) 11:39, December 30, 2009 (UTC)
I did think it was odd that they were separate, but I assumed that there was some reason for it. If we're going to merge them, I agree that it should be called Reptirron. Christophee (talk) 14:49, December 30, 2009 (UTC)


Are you sure that Reptirron The Second couldn't self-right because of a lack of power? To me, it looked like it was low on CO2. Helloher (Death is not my phone number) 17:25, July 31, 2010 (UTC)

Its flipper doesn't open wide enough to push it back onto its wheels. RA2; aka Resetti's Replicas. (My Talk) 22:04, July 31, 2010 (UTC)
I don't know of any robot's that does. The CO2 is meant to give enough momentum to push it back onto its wheels. However, the case regarding Reptirron is to be determined. Toon Ganondorf (t c) 03:57, August 1, 2010 (UTC)
That's what I mean, I watched it try to self-right against Firestorm. It looked like, even if it had more CO2 (and I'm not convinced it wasn't at full power), its shape and flipper design would still be unconducive to self-righting. RA2; aka Resetti's Replicas. (My Talk) 04:36, August 1, 2010 (UTC)
To me, the shape of the robot is not self-righting friendly, rather than a lack of power.Matt (Talk) 08:17, August 1, 2010 (UTC)
The first occasion that Reptirron fired its flipper in the fight was when it was upside-down, and it failed to self-right. ManUCrazy (talk) 15:15, August 1, 2010 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.