Before I make a proper start to this article, I need to know how we're going to structure it. Are we going to leave it simply as Revolution even though there was technically no robot with that name on the show, or are we going to use the name of either Revolution 2 or 3? I've seen both forms used as links across the wiki, so I wanted to make sure we all agreed on how we should do the article. Christophee (talk) 14:25, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Well, both versions of the robot only won a single battle, so that won't help. The way I see it, Revolution 2 could take priority as it appeared in more battles and looked more unique, but at the same time, Revolution 3 could because it was more successful in the UK Championships and was the more recent. We'll see which of those two arguments compell the most people, though. 17:48, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
But do we have to use either of them? There was no robot in Robots Wars called Plunderbird and yet that is the name of the article. Is there any reason why this one can't just be Revolution? Christophee (talk) 12:22, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
That's a good point, which I agree with. Llamaman201 13:26, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Okay, I'm going to expand this article using the current format. If we decide to change the name to one of the two robots, we can always rearrange it. Christophee (talk) 12:35, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

ManUCrazy seems to think we are splitting these. Is there any real reason for this? We're not splitting everyone. Toon Ganondorf (t c) 08:23, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
I see no reason at all to split this article. It's fine as it is. Christophee (talk) 13:04, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
Ok, fair enough. I just thought the designs were rather different. ManUCrazy 17:52, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
We split based on names, not designs, for further reference. Toon Ganondorf (t c) 22:59, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.